<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431</id><updated>2007-06-29T10:29:46.914-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Search Engine Optimization &amp; Internet Marketing</title><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/index.htm'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml'/><author><name>Ben</name></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>59</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-8579043333114665170</id><published>2007-06-29T10:17:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-06-29T10:17:10.704-06:00</updated><title type='text'>How to Build a Better Internet</title><summary type='text'>DARPA wants to build a better Internet - Engadget

From the looks of it, DARPA thinks there's plenty of room for improvement, stating the goal of the program as nothing less than to "improve transfer speeds, network routing efficiency, reliability, simplify network configuration, and reduce cost," adding that it's also interested in new addressing schemes to supplement the current IP scheme.

# </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2007/06/how-to-build-better-internet_29.htm' title='How to Build a Better Internet'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/29/darpa-wants-to-build-a-better-internet/' title='How to Build a Better Internet'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=8579043333114665170' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/8579043333114665170'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/8579043333114665170'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-7559012807061290907</id><published>2007-06-20T05:42:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-06-20T05:52:34.329-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Making a Background Image Visible in Firefox</title><summary type='text'>I have had a frequent and regular problem with making my background images show up in Firefox.  I do a search for "background image won't display in Firefox" and find that others too have the problem. Oddly enough this search has not yielded information that actually helped me to fix the problem. So I had to scratch and think.  

After much trial and error, I have figured it out.  Here is what I </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2007/06/making-background-image-visible-in.htm' title='Making a Background Image Visible in Firefox'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_background-position.asp' title='Making a Background Image Visible in Firefox'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=7559012807061290907' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/7559012807061290907'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/7559012807061290907'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-6154694504078983962</id><published>2007-01-09T06:02:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-01-09T06:08:23.478-06:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='usability'/><title type='text'>Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design</title><summary type='text'>It is interesting to think of how, 10 years ago, using the Internet was a novelty. I remember how most people were saying that people just wouldn't buy anything on the Net.  I first heard of Amazon.com by means of a radio interview of Jeff Bezos, and him talking about people's reluctance to use their credit cards on the Internet.  Now Amazon.com is a household name and people are VERY comfortable</summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2007/01/top-ten-mistakes-in-web-design.htm' title='Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html' title='Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=6154694504078983962' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/6154694504078983962'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/6154694504078983962'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-5016950242597295204</id><published>2006-12-17T14:12:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-12-17T14:13:08.082-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Search 2.0 - Whats Next?</title><summary type='text'>This is an amazing blog about the next innovations in search trends.

You may feel relatively satisfied with the current search offerings of Google, Yahoo, Ask and MSN. Search today is undoubtedly much better than what it was in the second half of the 1990's. But Internet search is still in its infancy and there's much room for improvement. Moreover, the super high valuation of Google on NASDAQ </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/12/search-20-whats-next.htm' title='Search 2.0 - Whats Next?'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/search_20_what_is_next.php' title='Search 2.0 - Whats Next?'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=5016950242597295204' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/5016950242597295204'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/5016950242597295204'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-3763080860601186739</id><published>2006-12-17T08:00:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-12-17T08:05:53.495-06:00</updated><title type='text'>My Favorite Firefox Extension</title><summary type='text'>Its difficult for me to say that its my favorite since there are so many that have become vital to my online experience.  Its just that I have lost so many bookmark files.  With this extension, you not only eliminate the danger of losing your bookmarks, but you can synch all of your computers to have the same up to date bookmarks.

Foxmarks Bookmark Synchronizer by Foxmarks LLC

Foxmarks keeps </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/12/my-favorite-firefox-extension.htm' title='My Favorite Firefox Extension'/><link rel='related' href='https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2410/' title='My Favorite Firefox Extension'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=3763080860601186739' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/3763080860601186739'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/3763080860601186739'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-116168810939413027</id><published>2006-10-24T05:08:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-10-24T05:08:30.953-06:00</updated><title type='text'>'Click Fraud' Threatens Foundation of Web Ads - washingtonpost.com</title><summary type='text'>It appears that a pay-per-click campaign's worst nightmares have come true.  
'Click Fraud' Threatens Foundation of Web Ads - washingtonpost.com: "'You don't make tons of money,' Park said. 'But once you start clicking and you get actual payments, it becomes an addiction.'

Park is one of thousands of people around the world who receive e-mailed lists of Web sites every day to click on for cash. </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/10/click-fraud-threatens-foundation-of.htm' title='&apos;Click Fraud&apos; Threatens Foundation of Web Ads - washingtonpost.com'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/21/AR2006102100936.html' title='&apos;Click Fraud&apos; Threatens Foundation of Web Ads - washingtonpost.com'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=116168810939413027' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/116168810939413027'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/116168810939413027'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-116048051386618832</id><published>2006-10-10T05:41:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-10-10T05:41:54.010-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Search Engine Facts 10 October 2006</title><summary type='text'>I just found this bit of info in an SEO newsletter that I receive regularly.  I really like the emphasis on good quality content.  We sometimes get to focusing too much on getting links. This is called external merit, or off site factors that promote web sites.  This is indeed important, but what we really need is a good quality content site.
Here is the bit:
I highly recommend keyword analysis, </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/10/search-engine-facts-10-october-2006.htm' title='Search Engine Facts 10 October 2006'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.axandra.com/' title='Search Engine Facts 10 October 2006'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=116048051386618832' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/116048051386618832'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/116048051386618832'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-115548440223151541</id><published>2006-08-13T09:49:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-08-13T09:53:22.270-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Page Strength - A New Measure of Relevance</title><summary type='text'>
The below is from a newsletter that I subscribe to at Pandia.com.
The SEOmoz Page Strength indicator  This has not stopped SEOmoz.org from trying. They are now presenting a new “Page Strength Indicator” based on the following measures:  Links pointing to full URL (Yahoo) Links pointing to domain (Yahoo) Position  for first four words of title tag on target URL (Google) Age of Domain Links from </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/08/page-strength-new-measure-of-relevance.htm' title='Page Strength - A New Measure of Relevance'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.seomoz.org/tools/page-strength.php' title='Page Strength - A New Measure of Relevance'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=115548440223151541' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115548440223151541'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115548440223151541'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-115210321464403453</id><published>2006-07-05T06:40:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-07-05T06:42:34.193-06:00</updated><title type='text'>What Google knows about your domain name</title><summary type='text'>This article makes some interesting points about how Google views domain names, and why it is sometimes better to purchase an existing domain.
What Google knows about your domain name: "Last year (2005), Google became a domain name registrar but they haven't offered domain registration services in the meantime."

The article goes on to speculate a bit as to why Google may have become a registrar.</summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/07/what-google-knows-about-your-domain.htm' title='What Google knows about your domain name'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter214.htm' title='What Google knows about your domain name'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=115210321464403453' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115210321464403453'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115210321464403453'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-115097918503717239</id><published>2006-06-22T06:20:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-06-22T06:26:25.053-06:00</updated><title type='text'>All About Google Sitemaps</title><summary type='text'>I kept reading about these things, these Google Site Maps.  I read a lot about them and still don't know if they are worth the time and effort, but I am expending the time and effort, so I figured that I ought to catalogue it.  

A complete discussion with extremely diverse opinions of the feature can be seen by clicking here.
On Google's site: About Site Maps
Using the Sitemap Generator</summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/06/all-about-google-sitemaps.htm' title='All About Google Sitemaps'/><link rel='related' href='https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=sitemaps' title='All About Google Sitemaps'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=115097918503717239' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115097918503717239'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115097918503717239'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-115033526932069206</id><published>2006-06-14T19:33:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-06-15T05:11:10.570-06:00</updated><title type='text'>GOOGLE ACCOUNTS FOR HALF OF ALL U.S. SEARCHES IN APRIL, ACCORDING</title><summary type='text'>Table 1: Search Share among Top 3 Search Providers, April 2006 (U.S.)
Search Provider Apr-05 Search Share Apr-06 Search Share Percentage Point Change
Google Search 47% 50% +3
Yahoo! Search 22% 22% 0
MSN Search 12% 11% -1
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings MegaView Search, May 2006
The top two search engines showed robust growth over the past year. Google Search grew 34 percent
year over year, followed </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/06/google-accounts-for-half-of-all-us.htm' title='GOOGLE ACCOUNTS FOR HALF OF ALL U.S. SEARCHES IN APRIL, ACCORDING'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_060525.pdf' title='GOOGLE ACCOUNTS FOR HALF OF ALL U.S. SEARCHES IN APRIL, ACCORDING'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=115033526932069206' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115033526932069206'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/115033526932069206'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-114613919869878765</id><published>2006-04-27T05:59:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-04-27T05:59:58.700-06:00</updated><title type='text'>A brief example of what Phishing is.</title><summary type='text'>New Tricks of a Browser Look Familiar - New York Times: "(An example of a phishing fraud is an e-mail message that says, 'Your eBay account will soon be closed; click here for details.' Worried, you click the provided link and confirm your account information. Unfortunately, you've just handed over your credit card and account numbers to the Internet baddies, who have set up a fake eBay screen </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/04/brief-example-of-what-phishing-is.htm' title='A brief example of what Phishing is.'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/27/technology/27pogue.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=2&amp;oref=slogin' title='A brief example of what Phishing is.'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=114613919869878765' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114613919869878765'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114613919869878765'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-114613866181152391</id><published>2006-04-27T05:51:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-04-27T06:10:19.693-06:00</updated><title type='text'>New Tricks of a Browser Look Familiar - New York Times</title><summary type='text'>New Tricks of a Browser Look Familiar - New York Times: 
I guess that since Microsoft is about to release a new browser that there is a bunch of attention now to the topic of browsers.  The only reason that I ever open up Internet Explorer is to see how a new web page I've made renders in it.  

It is a curious thing that this old, outdated, easy-to-hack browser is still the option of choice for </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/04/new-tricks-of-browser-look-familiar.htm' title='New Tricks of a Browser Look Familiar - New York Times'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/27/technology/27pogue.html' title='New Tricks of a Browser Look Familiar - New York Times'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=114613866181152391' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114613866181152391'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114613866181152391'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-114553397484998946</id><published>2006-04-20T05:23:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-04-20T06:16:41.136-06:00</updated><title type='text'>CSS &amp; Validator Links</title><summary type='text'>I am having a problem getting a CSS defined background to a CSS element #header to show in Firefox.  I did a search for the problem and found a pretty good thread about the problem at Webmaster world. The general consensus was that IE is non-standards compliant, and Firefox is. So one should write for Firefox and it'll all render in IE.  Below are a couple-a links to validators.
CSS Validator
</summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/04/css-validator-links.htm' title='CSS &amp; Validator Links'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum83/7738.htm' title='CSS &amp; Validator Links'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=114553397484998946' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114553397484998946'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114553397484998946'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-114536932772086505</id><published>2006-04-18T08:07:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-04-18T08:08:47.730-06:00</updated><title type='text'>DNS Report</title><summary type='text'>This site offers a test of DNS integrity.  There have been some site hijackings based on insecure DNS practices on the part of some ISPs.  This site offers a test for your ISP.

This site will provide you with a DNS report for your domain. A very large percentage of domains have DNS problems; this site will help you find those problems and fix them. Also, the "Mail Test" tool will help find mail </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/04/dns-report.htm' title='DNS Report'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.dnsreport.com/' title='DNS Report'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=114536932772086505' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114536932772086505'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114536932772086505'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-114295694092226057</id><published>2006-03-21T10:01:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-03-21T11:55:58.643-06:00</updated><title type='text'>How To Clean An Infected Computer</title><summary type='text'>After getting the java/OpenStream trojan horse virus, I  did a little research to find out the best way to get rid of it.  I came across this excellent article posted to the forum over at Grisoft; the folks that make that excellent free Anti Virus software AVG.  Anyway, you'll notice that it is a multipronged approach to keeping your computer squeeky clean from all viruses, spyware, trojan horses</summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/03/how-to-clean-infected-computer.htm' title='How To Clean An Infected Computer'/><link rel='related' href='http://forum.grisoft.cz/freeforum/read.php?4,27725,backpage=,sv=' title='How To Clean An Infected Computer'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=114295694092226057' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114295694092226057'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114295694092226057'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-114035567967620069</id><published>2006-02-19T07:27:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T07:27:59.843-06:00</updated><title type='text'>RoboForm - Reviews and free downloads at Download.com</title><summary type='text'>Every time that I arrive at a website that requires sign in, or has a form that I need to fill in, I remember the days of Gator, the spam-meister of all time.  The little program offered to remember all your passwords and fill in forms, and all that it asked back was that you allow them to barrage you with spam.  There are times when I almost miss that racket.  

I just found this little program </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/02/roboform-reviews-and-free-downloads-at.htm' title='RoboForm - Reviews and free downloads at Download.com'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.download.com/RoboForm/3000-2092-10037672.html?part=dl-RoboForm&amp;subj=dl&amp;tag=button' title='RoboForm - Reviews and free downloads at Download.com'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=114035567967620069' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114035567967620069'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/114035567967620069'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113992128206982262</id><published>2006-02-14T06:48:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-02-14T06:48:02.086-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Stanford University reveals how to add credibility to your web site</title><summary type='text'>The advent of the Internet has created a new universe where behavior patterns are unknown. For instance, how will people find what they are looking for on the web?  It has come to our knowledge now that the majority use search engines. We know that most people click on the organic links in the Search Engine responses and not the for-pay ones.  Understanding how a human will use the virutal world </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/02/stanford-university-reveals-how-to-add.htm' title='The Stanford University reveals how to add credibility to your web site'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter198.htm' title='The Stanford University reveals how to add credibility to your web site'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113992128206982262' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113992128206982262'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113992128206982262'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113992063027644572</id><published>2006-02-14T06:37:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2006-02-14T06:37:10.320-06:00</updated><title type='text'>EFF: Breaking News</title><summary type='text'>I remember when Microsoft was considered the barefoot, cool place to work.  Everything wsa laid back and casual.  Somewhere along the line MS became a behemoth, and it seems that the people don't like behemoths.  After squashing everyone's darling Netscape with uncanny business practices, MS has slipped into behemothdom, the quintessential BIG business, and nobody seems to like them.

Google has </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2006/02/eff-breaking-news.htm' title='EFF: Breaking News'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_02.php#004400' title='EFF: Breaking News'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113992063027644572' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113992063027644572'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113992063027644572'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113568232301600887</id><published>2005-12-27T05:18:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2005-12-27T05:18:43.066-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The importance of being first in search engines. How can you benefit from this?</title><summary type='text'>The importance of being first in search engines. How can you benefit from this?: "A recently conducted study (PDF) examined the links users followed on the search engine results page. They found that 42% of users clicked the top result, and 8% of users clicked the second result. This confirms previous studies that the number one result gets many more clicks than all other results.

In this </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2005/12/importance-of-being-first-in-search.htm' title='The importance of being first in search engines. How can you benefit from this?'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter180.htm' title='The importance of being first in search engines. How can you benefit from this?'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113568232301600887' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113568232301600887'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113568232301600887'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113543020371222363</id><published>2005-12-24T07:15:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2005-12-24T07:16:54.210-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Forward new G-mail to your phone</title><summary type='text'>I don't know how important this would be to the common Joe on the street.  I don't know if I'm even going to use it. But the information is just esoteric enough... and I might find myself using it at some point, that I figure: hey, how else can a guy remember such a tip without sticking it in his blog?

Sending Gmail To Your Mobile Phone: "Did you know you can have Gmail forward your new mail to </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2005/12/forward-new-g-mail-to-your-phone.htm' title='Forward new G-mail to your phone'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113543020371222363' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113543020371222363'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113543020371222363'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113197866597900100</id><published>2005-11-14T08:31:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2005-11-14T08:42:22.213-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Pocket PC Favorite Utilities</title><summary type='text'>In my ongoing efforts to get organized, a project that I'll likely take to my grave, I have purchased an HP 1955 Pocket PC.  My good friend Larry of No Blood fame, and  who is a nut for such things, sent me this list of utilities for the gadget.  From this list, I have investigated the first 2, and have bought them both.  So I am assuming that the list, in its entirety, is worthwhile in the </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2005/11/pocket-pc-favorite-utilities.htm' title='Pocket PC Favorite Utilities'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113197866597900100' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113197866597900100'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113197866597900100'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113128996688392308</id><published>2005-11-06T09:10:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2005-11-06T09:19:12.633-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Firefox Gains Ground Against Internet Explorer</title><summary type='text'>
Its hard to imagine that an internet browser that is built into the code of the Windows operating system could be losing ground to one that needs to be downloaded and installed.  But this is the case according to the recent statistics below.


Firefox's global usage share has reached 11.5 percent, says One Stat. Internet Explorer is still the browser of choice for the vast majority of the online</summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2005/11/firefox-gains-ground-against-internet.htm' title='Firefox Gains Ground Against Internet Explorer'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.WebProNews.com' title='Firefox Gains Ground Against Internet Explorer'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113128996688392308' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113128996688392308'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113128996688392308'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113024535602043547</id><published>2005-10-25T07:02:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2005-10-25T07:02:36.020-06:00</updated><title type='text'>How to deal with Google's latest search engine algorithm</title><summary type='text'>How to deal with Google's latest search engine algorithm: "What is latent semantic indexing?

      LSI means that a search engine tries to associate certain terms with concepts when indexing web pages. For example, Paris and Hilton are associated with a woman instead of a city and a hotel, Tiger and Woods are associated with golf.

      Google has been using this concept to determine </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2005/10/how-to-deal-with-googles-latest-search.htm' title='How to deal with Google&apos;s latest search engine algorithm'/><link rel='related' href='http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter147.htm#facts' title='How to deal with Google&apos;s latest search engine algorithm'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113024535602043547' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113024535602043547'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113024535602043547'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6765431.post-113024528731941673</id><published>2005-10-25T07:01:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2005-10-25T07:15:33.913-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Latent Semantic Indexing</title><summary type='text'>Latent Semantic Indexing: "LATENT SEMANTIC INDEXING

Taking a Holistic View

Regular keyword searches approach a document collection with a kind of accountant mentality: a document contains a given word or it doesn't, with no middle ground. We create a result set by looking through each document in turn for certain keywords and phrases, tossing aside any documents that don't contain them, and </summary><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/2005/10/latent-semantic-indexing.htm' title='Latent Semantic Indexing'/><link rel='related' href='http://research.nitle.org/lsi/lsa_definition.htm' title='Latent Semantic Indexing'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6765431&amp;postID=113024528731941673' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.costaricadesign.com/blog/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113024528731941673'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6765431/posts/default/113024528731941673'/><author><name>Ben</name></author></entry></feed>